Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madrasah as-Sawlatiyah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 04:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Madrasah as-Sawlatiyah[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No scope to keep, because unable to pass even the WP:GNG. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 06:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 06:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The nominator has not provided any valid rationale for deletion. The ar.wiki article has three sources. If they’re not good enough the nominator should explain why. Mccapra (talk) 10:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Schools need to pass the GNGs same as everyone else, and I'm not seeing a lot of sources. However I'm going to give this the benefit of the doubt because a) the ar.wiki has some sources, b) if this really is a 100+ year old school then notability is likely and c) because the nominator has not actually advanced a proper, policy-based argument for deletion. Hug^syrup 11:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per above, but sources must be added. Ambrosiawater (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Notability is proven by an abundance of sources in Arabic, English, and other languages. When searching for non-Arabic sources alternate spellings should be considered:
- English: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Arabic: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Axiom292 (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.